![]() ![]() IMO and the way I see it, when I lived in Vegas for four years played EZ Bac about 80% of the time when I was able to get a seat at this game, Putting the mathematics and the house edge aside, This is a link to wizardofodds with the house for the regular game with commission.= House edge = 1.06īut rather then getting into a pissing contest about the house edge, as the difference between the two is so small it really does not make all that much difference overall. This is a link to wizardofodds with the house for EZ Bac (even though he is using a six deck shoe it would not make that much difference in a shoe eight deck shoe)= House edge = 1.02 This is a link to the company who invented EZ Bac with their description of the odds. The Bank edge makes the casino edge even greater. ![]() I like to play it too but only because it is faster - not because it has better odds - it doesn't.īTW, 5% commission on Bank wins works out to 1.25% of the money bet.Įven forgetting the Bank edge and assuming you bet Bank half the time and that Bank wins half the time, that makes commission 5%/4 = 1.25%. So even forgetting the sucker bets, overall EZ Bac favors the casino slightly more than when commission is collected the standard way. That works out to more than 5% commission. Instead of paying 5% on Bank wins they are calling specific Bank wins a push instead of a win. ![]() Norm, I'm sure you can check with the Wizard of Odds but you are paying more commission. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |